This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
A Brazilian-trained nurse who founded a U.S. company through which she intended to work as a 'nursing management specialist,' providing management and guidance to nursing departments at U.S. hospitals and healthcare facilities.
Field: nursing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
AAO reversed the Director's finding; Petitioner established more than five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, qualifying as an advanced degree professional.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“The Petitioner has not sufficiently demonstrated that her specific endeavor would have national implications for the healthcare field or the economy.”
“Even if these projections are realistic, however, the record does not establish that they are nationally significant or that the business would benefit an economically depressed area.”
“The expert opinion letters do not state that the Petitioner's specific venture - by itself- would significantly affect the U.S. healthcare field or economy.”
“For the foregoing reasons, the Petitioner has not demonstrated that her proposed endeavor has national importance.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- resume experience · credited
- business plan · discounted
“the record does not establish that they are nationally significant or that the business would benefit an economically depressed area”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“the letters describe her endeavor as contributing to the improvement of U.S. healthcare”
AAO decision text - degree · credited
Where this case turned
- Business plan speculative · p1 — projections without a documented basis or steps
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Letters not independent · p1 — letters come from employers and close collaborators, not independent experts
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
Notable
AAO reversed the Director on the threshold advanced-degree issue, finding the Director wrongly perceived a conflict between two employer letters describing the Petitioner's CSSD nursing work, but still dismissed on national importance alone, expressly declining to reach prongs 2 and 3.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(g)(1)
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
- Matter of Ho
- Matter of L-A-C-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a pharmacist, proposed to work in the United States through her own company providing pharmaceutical reg
- The Petitioner, a Brazilian-trained physiotherapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist and entrepreneur in the Un
- The Petitioner, a resident physician in New York holding a Chinese bachelor of medicine (MBBS) degree found equivalent t
- The Petitioner, a music therapist, proposed to establish and expand music therapy services and community music programs
- The Petitioner, a physical therapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist in the United States while operating his