NIW Bearings
dismissedOCT012024_05B52032024-10-01 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a construction manager and civil engineer, sought an EB-2 national interest waiver, but the specific endeavor is not described in this procedural decision.

Field: construction management / civil engineering · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • other · discounted
    there is no clear evidence that USCIS may have improperly discharged its duties when processing the prior combined motion
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision is purely procedural: it addresses only the timeliness of the Petitioner's second combined motion to reopen and reconsider (mailbox-rule and presumption-of-regularity arguments), and does not reach any NIW prong analysis on the merits.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(i)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

The combined motion to reopen/reconsider was untimely filed (received 33+ days late); Petitioner failed to rebut presumption of regularity in USCIS receipt records or show reasonable excusable delay.

Transferable lesson

File motions well within the regulatory deadline and retain verifiable delivery/tracking evidence; mailing date does not establish USCIS receipt date.

Endeavor framing

vague

Evidence targeting

mixed

Cases in adjacent profiles