NIW Bearings
dismissedNOV292023_02B52032023-11-29 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a lawyer, proposed to provide legal services to businesses in the United States.

Field: law · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Petitioner's endeavor does not reach a level of national importance to warrant a waiver of the job offer requirement

AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
1,748coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision in full (Matter of Burbano) rather than conducting independent analysis, noting the Petitioner failed to specify any erroneous conclusions in the Director's decision as required by 8 C.F.R. 103.3(a)(1)(v). The Petitioner conceded substantial merit and EB-2 eligibility were found below; only national importance (prong 1) was at issue and was dispositive.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • Chen v. INS

Cases in adjacent profiles