NIW Bearings
dismissedNOV052024_03B52032024-11-05 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, an IT delivery lead/project manager specializing in data center centralization and cybersecurity, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability with a national interest waiver.

Field: information technology / data center management · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner satisfied only two of six exceptional-ability criteria (degree and ten years' experience); AAO agreed she failed to meet the salary/remuneration criterion (D) and the recognition-for-significant-contributions criterion (F), leaving her short of the required three criteria.

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    the letters do not explain how this resulted in significant contributions to her field
    AAO decision text
  • awards · discounted
    these do not indicate significant contributions to the field more widely, as they appear to be limited to her employer
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    the letter does not establish that her salary relevant to others working within her field demonstrated exceptional ability
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · credited

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO found the threshold exceptional-ability determination dispositive and expressly declined to reach the Dhanasar national interest waiver analysis, reserving those arguments entirely.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(iii)
  • Flores v. Garland
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Matter of O-R-E-
  • Matter of R-A-M-

Cases in adjacent profiles