This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an industrial machinery mechanic with two decades of experience as an electromechanical maintenance technician in Brazil, sought to work in the same occupation in the United States and requested a national interest waiver.
Field: industrial machinery mechanics / electromechanical maintenance · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — not met
SCOPS and AAO found the Petitioner met only 2 of 6 exceptional-ability criteria (degree and 10 years' experience), failing license/certification, salary, membership, and recognition criteria, so exceptional ability was not established.
How the evidence was treated
- certification membership · discounted
“the Petitioner has not asserted, and the record does not otherwise demonstrate, that the IEEE or ASME require its members to possess the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“the letters describe the Petitioner as a valued employee and colleague, making positive contributions to his client operations”
AAO decision text - resume experience · credited
- degree · credited
- other · discounted
“the Petitioner has not sufficiently demonstrated the applicable average annual salary given his level of experience in Brazil”
AAO decision text
All 6 evidence items
- awards · discounted
“it is not clear how the Petitioner's participation in the "1st Science Fair" and "Cultural Week"... represents recognition for achievement”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is an NIW petition, but the AAO never reached the national interest waiver analysis because the Petitioner failed the threshold exceptional-ability requirement (met only 2 of 6 regulatory criteria); the AAO expressly stated further NIW analysis 'would also serve no meaningful purpose.'
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5
- INA 203(b)(2)
- Matter of Ho
- USCIS Policy Manual F.5(B)(2)
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod