This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a mathematics teacher, sought to continue working as a teacher in the United States.
Field: mathematics teaching · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“the Petitioner does not provide new facts related to our prior decision or any new documentary evidence”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a second-tier motion decision (motion to reopen/reconsider a prior AAO dismissal of a combined motion, which itself followed a summary dismissal of the original appeal). The AAO does not reach or re-analyze any NIW prong; it dismisses solely because the Petitioner's new personal statement (discussing pandemic hardship and commitment to teaching) presented no new facts or legal error argument, citing Matter of O-S-G.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an assistant professor of Arabic, proposed to continue teaching Levantine-Modern Standard Arabic to U.S.
- The Petitioner, a secondary school teacher, proposed to develop and implement an open educational resource program to ex
- The Petitioner proposed to establish a consulting company in Missouri to design and implement a nationally adaptable tea
- The Petitioner, an arts, drama, and music teacher and entrepreneur, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of excep
- The petitioner, a mathematics teacher with 17 years of experience, proposed to operate a company offering online math tu