NIW Bearings
dismissedMAY142019_01B52032019-05-14 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a naturopathic physician running a private practice in rural Minnesota, sought to continue treating cancer and other patients using integrative/naturopathic medicine, and volunteered to write exam items for the naturopathic physicians' licensing board.

Field: naturopathic medicine · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; this was not disputed.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Director concluded that the Petitioner's "services appear to only impact a population in Minnesota"
the record does not establish that her clinical work would impact the naturopathic field and healthcare industry more broadly, as opposed to being limited to the patients she serves
In determining national importance, the relevant question is not the importance of the industry or profession in which the individual will work
The record, however, does not demonstrate that her medical practice has significant potential to employ U.S. workers or otherwise offers substantial positive economic effects for our nation
the evidence does not demonstrate that the implications of her proposed volunteer service for NPLEX and the potential prospective impact of this work rise to the level of national importance

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    letters of support from patients explaining how the Petitioner provided them with quality medical care
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    the record does not establish that her clinical work would impact the naturopathic field and healthcare industry more broadly
    AAO decision text
  • degree · credited
  • motion resubmission · discounted

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO expressly rejected an 'impact of the industry' argument, distinguishing the field's importance from the specific endeavor's importance; also addressed volunteer exam-writing work as a separate potential endeavor and found it insufficient both in scope of time devoted and in national importance.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • INA 203(b)(2)

Cases in adjacent profiles