NIW Bearings
dismissedMAR292024_06B52032024-03-29 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a chemical engineer, proposed to work as an independent consultant advising small and medium-sized American cosmetics companies on chemical formulation methodologies for skin and hair products.

Field: chemical engineering / cosmetics formulation consulting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

The Petitioner's proposed endeavor is to serve as a consultant to small and medium sized American companies in the cosmetic industry.
we adopt and affirm the Director's ultimate determination relating only to the national importance requirements under Dhanasar 's first prong with the added comments below.

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • other · discounted
    the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the Director's failure to discuss every document in detail changed the outcome of the case.
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
1,748coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO extensively discusses harmless-error and prejudice doctrine, finding the Director's failure to address every piece of evidence non-prejudicial. It also notes counsel's brief contained arguments 'that do not appear to apply to this case,' suggesting possible template reuse, and observes the Director's decision contained internally conflicting findings on prong 2 (favorable on p.4, adverse on p.6), but declines to resolve this because prong 1 alone was dispositive.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • Buletini v. INS
  • Flores v. Garland

Cases in adjacent profiles