This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an embedded software engineer, proposed to conduct research and development in computer systems focusing on machine learning at the edge and hardware-software interfaces, aiming to extend AI capabilities on edge hardware and lower technical barriers to entry for edge AI users.
Field: software engineering / edge AI and hardware-software interfaces · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
SCOPS determined and AAO agreed that the Petitioner qualifies for EB-2 as an advanced degree professional based on a master of science degree in electrical and computer engineering.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the record lacks sufficient probative, credible documentary evidence to demonstrate that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has the potential to impact the field of edge AI, or national security, at a level commensurate with national importance.”
“the record lacks documentary evidence to support these claims or to otherwise demonstrate the interest of the U.S. armed forces or the Department of Defense in the Petitioner's technological developments.”
“these support letters primarily discuss the Petitioner's research work as a graduate student, rather than his proposed endeavor as an employee of [employer] or its potential prospective impact.”
“S.A. does not discuss the potential prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor at [employer]. He states only that his work at [employer] is 'another example of his innovative work.'”
“the record lacks documentary evidence to establish this type of widespread interest in the Petitioner's proposed endeavor, that it is novel and important, or that it stands to impact the field.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“these support letters primarily discuss the Petitioner's research work as a graduate student, rather than his proposed endeavor as an employee”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“this statement lacks sufficient specificity about the endeavor itself or its potential prospective impact to be credible or persuasive in establishing its national importance.”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“The evidence does not show that the Petitioner's specific area of research, edge AI computing, has been integral to [employer's] participation in these competitions”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“the record lacks sufficient documentary evidence to support the potential prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor.”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Employer-specific benefit · p1 — "work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
- Letters conclusory · p1 — letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
- Letters not independent · p1 — letters come from employers and close collaborators, not independent experts
Notable
The AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal, invoking Matter of Furtado and 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(11), finding the Petitioner had been put on notice of evidentiary deficiencies via RFE and given a reasonable opportunity to respond. The AAO also explicitly distinguished the record from Matter of Dhanasar on its facts, noting the absence of probative letters from senior government or academic officials and lack of documentary corroboration for claimed DoD/U.S. Army interest. The Petitioner's procedural argument that SCOPS provided only 'generic' language was rejected after de novo review. The AAO cited non-precedent decisions submitted by the Petitioner but noted they are not binding under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(c).
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod