NIW Bearings
dismissedMAR072023_03B52032023-03-07 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

A civil engineer sought classification as an individual of exceptional ability and an NIW to continue working in her field, though the specific proposed endeavor was not discussed because the AAO resolved the case on threshold exceptional-ability grounds.

Field: civil engineering · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Petitioner conceded the advanced-degree professional issue and instead argued she met the exceptional-ability regulatory criteria; the AAO found she satisfied only two of the required three criteria, failing the 'achievements and significant contributions' criterion under 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F) because her submitted expert letter did not identify specific achievements or explain their significance.

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    the letter does not sufficiently demonstrate her recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO expressly declined to reach the national interest waiver analysis under Dhanasar, resolving the appeal entirely on the threshold exceptional-ability determination (failure of one of three required regulatory criteria), citing Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for the principle that agencies need not decide unnecessary issues.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Poursina v. USCIS
  • USCIS Policy Manual F.5(B)(2)

Cases in adjacent profiles