NIW Bearings
sustainedMAR032025_04B52032025-03-03 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to research plant biotic stresses and develop rapid plant disease diagnostic tools, including work on late blight, sclerotinia stem rot, and pod shattering, to improve crop disease resistance and yield.

Field: plant sciences / plant pathology · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

Director already found Petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional based on his Master of Science degree; not disputed on appeal.

Prong 2 — well positionedestablished

Prong 3 — balance of factorsestablished

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · credited
  • citations publications · credited
  • funding · credited
  • degree · credited
  • resume experience · credited
All 6 evidence items
  • business plan · credited

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The Director had already found prong 1 (substantial merit and national importance) satisfied and only disputed prongs 2 and 3; AAO addressed only those two prongs, finding both met and sustaining the appeal, relying in part on USCIS Policy Manual STEM/critical-and-emerging-technologies guidance for prong 3.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • Flores v. Garland
  • USCIS Policy Manual F.5(D)(2)

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Petitioner demonstrated well-positioned status via funding (USDA, NSF), citations, employment offers, and combined this with STEM/critical-emerging-tech positive factors satisfying prong 3's urgency/balance test.

Transferable lesson

Pair concrete progress evidence (funding, citations, job offers) with STEM/critical-tech policy factors to satisfy prongs 2 and 3, not just prong 1 importance.

Endeavor framing

specific

National-importance theory

critical_emerging_tech · stem_positive_factor · economic_growth_generic · field_advancement

Evidence targeting

mixed

Cases in adjacent profiles