NIW Bearings
otherJUN272019_01B52032019-06-27 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a teacher, sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver, though the underlying endeavor is not described in this procedural decision.

Field: teaching · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    the current motion to reopen does include new facts or evidence establishing that the June 2018 motion was timely
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This decision does not reach the NIW prongs at all; it is a purely procedural ruling denying combined motions to reopen and reconsider a prior AAO dismissal, on the ground that the Petitioner failed to show his earlier motion to reopen was timely or that the untimeliness should be excused (new counsel retention, financial difficulty). The AAO also notes the Petitioner did not raise, and did not support, an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim under Matter of Lozada against his former attorney.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • INA 291

Cases in adjacent profiles