The Petitioner sought to operate an educational consultancy business in Florida, providing teacher certifications and trainings aimed at improving educational processes and outcomes.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“the relevant question is not the importance of the industry, field, or profession in which an individual will work”

“The evidence does not establish that the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor-to establish a consultancy business-has the potential to impact the issue of teacher shortages or improve the educational system at a level commensurate with national importance.”

“The record also lacks sufficient evidence to establish the claimed positive economic benefits of the proposed endeavor.”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

• other · discounted

  “the relevant question is not the importance of the industry, field, or profession in which an individual will work”

  AAO decision text

Where this case turned

• Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
• Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
• Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor

Notable

The Petitioner argued on appeal that the Director mischaracterized the endeavor as merely 'working as an educator' rather than establishing a consultancy business; the AAO rejected this characterization argument and found the record failed regardless. AAO expressly reserved opinion on prongs 2 and 3, citing Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for declining to reach unnecessary issues.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

• 8 C.F.R. 103.3
• Flores v. Garland
• Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Petitioner proposed to work as an IT consultant in the United States, providing cybersecurity and digital transforma
• The petitioner proposed to establish his own company providing specialized business consultancy, auditing, and training
• The petitioner proposed to work as a consultant engineer through his own company, specializing in development projects t
• The Petitioner proposed to start a project management consultancy in the United States that would help small and mid-siz
• The Petitioner proposed to establish a legal consultancy in the United States focused on alternative dispute resolution