NIW Bearings
remandedJUN092021_01B52032021-06-09 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a structural engineer, sought EB-2 classification with a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement.

Field: structural engineering · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

The Director never determined whether Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree; AAO found the record and decision insufficient to review this threshold issue and remanded for a determination.

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO remanded because the Director conducted a Dhanasar national-interest-waiver analysis without first determining whether the Petitioner met the threshold advanced-degree professional classification; the Director also mischaracterized the underlying basis (exceptional ability vs. advanced degree) in the RFE. No Dhanasar prong analysis was reached by the AAO.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • INA 203(b)(2)

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Director skipped threshold determination of whether Petitioner qualifies as an advanced-degree professional before conducting Dhanasar NIW analysis, making the decision unreviewable.

Transferable lesson

Ensure the underlying classification eligibility (e.g., advanced degree/professional status) is adjudicated and documented before the NIW Dhanasar analysis is conducted or challenged.

Endeavor framing

vague

Evidence targeting

mixed

Cases in adjacent profiles