NIW Bearings
dismissedJUN062025_01B52032025-06-06 · combined

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a management and financial analyst, proposed an endeavor supported by a business plan involving incorporation documents and an operational blueprint for her own company.

Field: management and financial analysis · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • business plan · discounted
    A petitioner may not make material changes to a petition that has already been filed to make a deficient petition conform
    AAO decision text
  • motion resubmission · discounted
    The Petitioner's contentions in her current motion reassert claims we have already considered in our previous decisions.
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · ignored
    apart from her business plan and support letters, the Petitioner does not cite any evidence to support her claims
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is the Petitioner's second round of motions after a prior AAO appeal dismissal and a prior motion dismissal; the AAO treats the motion as merely reasserting prior claims without new facts or law, citing Rijal v. USCIS (an EB-1 case) as inapplicable. Prongs were not substantively re-analyzed because the motion failed on procedural grounds (no new facts/law) rather than merits.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Matter of Coelho
  • Matter of Izummi
  • Matter of Katigbak
  • Matter of O-S-G-

Cases in adjacent profiles