NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL302024_12B52032024-07-30 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner initially proposed to work in the United States as an aircraft maintenance specialist on established projects, troubleshooting and repairing aircraft; on motion he attempted to recast this as a broader initiative to revolutionize U.S. aviation maintenance through sustainable practices and technician training.

Field: aircraft mechanical maintenance · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    we will not consider the Petitioner's materially changed proposed endeavor
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The decision does not substantively analyze any Dhanasar prong; instead it dismisses the combined motion because the Petitioner materially changed the proposed endeavor on motion (invoking Matter of Izummi), a procedural bar rather than a prong-specific merits failure.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(12)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho
  • Matter of Izummi
  • Matter of Katigbak

Cases in adjacent profiles