NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL242023_03B52032023-07-24 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to identify the needs of young children and adult immigrants and develop/deliver programs and services, including employment, language, and occupational skills training, to support their integration.

Field: English teaching / immigrant services and administration · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Employment letters lacked dates of employment, hours worked per week, and specific duties, failing to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · discounted
    they did not include the Petitioner's specific dates of employment, number of hours worked per week, or specific duties
    AAO decision text
  • degree · credited
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    neither the letters, nor the Petitioner, claim that she was working as an English teacher and/or administrator
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO dismissed solely on threshold EB-2 grounds (insufficient evidence of five years progressive experience) and expressly declined to reach the Dhanasar NIW prongs, reserving that issue. Also noted one letter lacked official letterhead.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles