This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a nurse, proposed to work as a nurse, healthcare manager, and nursing professor across various healthcare institutions and specialties in the United States.
Field: nursing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
The Director found, and the AAO did not dispute, that the Petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“This does not provide a sufficient basis to evaluate the specific endeavor's potential national importance.”
“while nursing is an endeavor of substantial merit, that does not mean that all nursing positions are therefore endeavors with national importance.”
“it is not apparent from the evidence provided how the Petitioner's employment as a nurse would, in and of itself: resolve this shortage or impact it on a national level.”
“she does not specify how, as one nurse, she would impact this shortage on a level rising to national importance.”
“she has not demonstrated that the specific endeavor she proposes to undertake has significant potential to employ U.S. workers or otherwise offers substantial positive economic effects”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- resume experience · discounted
“these factors speak to the second prong of the Dhanasar test... The Petitioner's abilities as a nurse do not establish that her endeavor's impact would rise to the level of national importance.”
AAO decision text - certification membership · discounted
“the Petitioner has not provided any evidence that she is licensed to practice nursing in the United States.”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“this is not a waiver of the job offer requirement, and as such does not support a finding that working as a nurse inherently has national importance”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
- Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
Notable
The AAO discussed DOL's Schedule A designation for nursing shortages, clarifying that this labor-market exemption does not equate to a national interest waiver or establish national importance. A footnote also advised that evidence of a nursing license, if required, would be relevant to prong two in any future filing.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Matter of L-A-C-
- USCIS Policy Manual F.5(D)(1)
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a pharmacist, proposed to work in the United States through her own company providing pharmaceutical reg
- The Petitioner, a Brazilian-trained physiotherapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist and entrepreneur in the Un
- The Petitioner, a resident physician in New York holding a Chinese bachelor of medicine (MBBS) degree found equivalent t
- The Petitioner, a music therapist, proposed to establish and expand music therapy services and community music programs
- The Petitioner, a physical therapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist in the United States while operating his