dismissedJUL092024_03B52032024-07-09 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an anti-bullying educator, proposed to implement a pedagogical intervention project in Florida schools to analyze, detect, treat, and raise awareness of bullying, aiming to reduce physical and online violence and improve student psychological and organizational outcomes.
Field: anti-bullying education / pedagogical intervention · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the relevant question is not the importance of the industry or profession in which the individual will work; instead, we focus on "the specific endeavor that the foreign national proposes to undertake."”
“This program plan lacks detail as to how the Petitioner will be able to enter public schools across Florida to train and present the project”
“The evidence does not show through supporting documentation that the endeavor sufficiently extends beyond her prospective schools to impact the field or the U.S. economy more broadly at a level commensurate with national importance.”
“it does not explain how it would have broader implications for our country or how the program would expand.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“it does not explain how it would have broader implications for our country or how the program would expand.”
AAO decision text - business plan · discounted
“This program plan lacks detail as to how the Petitioner will be able to enter public schools across Florida to train and present the project”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“the matter here is not whether bullying is a nationally important problem.”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Business plan speculative · p1 — projections without a documented basis or steps
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Letters conclusory · p1 — letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
1,312coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
AAO agreed the Petitioner established substantial merit but not national importance; declined to reach prongs 2 and 3 as unnecessary, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C- for not reaching alternate issues once petitioner fails to meet burden.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Flores v. Garland
- INA 203(b)(2)
- Matter of L-A-C-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an assistant professor of Arabic, proposed to continue teaching Levantine-Modern Standard Arabic to U.S.
- The Petitioner, a secondary school teacher, proposed to develop and implement an open educational resource program to ex
- The Petitioner proposed to establish a consulting company in Missouri to design and implement a nationally adaptable tea
- The Petitioner, an arts, drama, and music teacher and entrepreneur, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of excep
- The petitioner, a mathematics teacher with 17 years of experience, proposed to operate a company offering online math tu