NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL082024_01B52032024-07-08 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner proposed to work as a franchise and business management consultant through his own company, offering financial advisory, strategic planning, and M&A services to small and medium-sized businesses, particularly fast-food restaurants, and to run executive training programs for CFA and CMA designations.

Field: franchise and business management consulting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

Director found, and AAO agreed, that Petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional based on his bachelor's in electrical engineering and MBA.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

in determining national importance, the relevant question is not the importance of the industry or profession in which the individual will work.
the articles and reports do not directly address the Petitioner's specific proposed undertaking and do not adequately explain how his proposed endeavor to provide business management and financial advisory services to businesses through his company offers benefits that extend beyond his company and its clients
the Petitioner has not established that his proposed endeavor stands to impact or significantly reduce the claimed national shortage.
a shortage of qualified professionals alone is not sufficient to demonstrate eligibility for the national interest waiver.
the record does not contain sufficient evidence supporting the income projections or staffing requirements.
the record does not sufficiently demonstrate that his instructional or teaching activities offer benefits that extend beyond his students or trainees to impact the field of business management, the field of finance, or the field of accounting more broadly.
neither letter explains how the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance.

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • other · discounted
    the articles and reports do not directly address the Petitioner's specific proposed undertaking
    AAO decision text
  • business plan · discounted
    the record does not contain sufficient evidence supporting the income projections or staffing requirements.
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    neither letter explains how the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance.
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · ignored
  • certification membership · ignored

Where this case turned

  • Business plan speculative · p1projections without a documented basis or steps
  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Letters conclusory · p1letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
  • Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
1,312coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The Petitioner cited two prior non-precedent AAO decisions involving extraordinary ability petitions to support his argument; the AAO rejected these as non-binding and factually distinguishable. The Petitioner also raised a regulatory argument under 20 C.F.R. 656.3 regarding self-employed individuals filing labor certifications, which the AAO did not directly address given the dispositive prong 1 failure.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Flores v. Garland
  • Matter of L-A-C-

Cases in adjacent profiles