NIW Bearings
dismissedJUL072025_02B52032025-07-07 · appeal

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

A Brazilian physiotherapist with decades of private practice and naval service sought to work as a physical therapist in U.S. hospitals.

Field: physical therapy · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

AAO withdrew SCOPS's finding that Petitioner met three of six exceptional-ability criteria, finding she met only two (education, license/certification) and failed experience, membership, remuneration, and recognition criteria; alternatively, even under a final merits determination the totality of evidence did not show expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · discounted
    the letter does not meet the requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) as it does not contain a specific description of the duties performed
    AAO decision text
  • certification membership · discounted
    the record does not contain documents describing the requirements for membership in the association
    AAO decision text
  • degree · discounted
    the Petitioner's documented academic record and documented experience do not demonstrate a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    the letters do not explain how this research is relevant to the field of physical therapy and whether the Petitioner was recognized
    AAO decision text
  • citations publications · discounted
    the articles are only a few paragraphs long, do not contain any citations to research, and do not discuss any personal research
    AAO decision text
All 7 evidence items
  • awards · discounted
    her recognition by the Navy does not support her significant contributions to her field of physiotherapy
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    the record does not contain evidence of her monthly salary
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The case was resolved entirely at the threshold exceptional-ability step; the AAO withdrew several of SCOPS's favorable criteria findings (experience, membership) even while affirming the ultimate denial, then conducted a final merits determination without ever reaching the Dhanasar NIW prongs. The AAO relied on AACRAO EDGE database and DOL Occupational Outlook Handbook to assess foreign credential and field-standard educational requirements.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(g)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(iii)
  • Flores v. Garland
  • Matter of O-R-E-
  • Matter of R-A-M-
  • USCIS Policy Manual F.5(B)(2)

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 exceptional-ability eligibility: only two of six regulatory criteria were satisfied and final merits review showed no expertise significantly above the field, making NIW analysis moot.

Transferable lesson

Secure eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification (three properly documented criteria plus genuine final-merits distinction) before any NIW argument can be reached.

Endeavor framing

vague

Evidence targeting

person_focused

Cases in adjacent profiles