This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
A senior engineer with a Ph.D. in microwave electronics sought to continue applying his RF/microwave modeling techniques at a U.S. company, including designing radar sensors for speed-tracking systems and high-efficiency amplifiers for 5G cellular networks.
Field: RF/microwave engineering (wireless communications) · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional based on his Ph.D.; not disputed on appeal.
Prong 1 — national importanceestablished
Prong 3 — balance of factorsestablished
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · credited
- citations publications · credited
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a legacy NYSDOT-era decision (pre-Dhanasar, decided July 2016) applying the three-part intrinsic merit / national scope / greater-degree-than-U.S.-worker test. The dispute concentrated on the third NYSDOT factor, but the AAO's actual analysis (weighing letters, citations, and evidence of practical implementation to show 'a history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field') more closely resembles a Dhanasar prong-2 'well positioned' inquiry than a labor-market-substitution analysis, illustrating the mapping mismatch noted in the coding instructions. The AAO reversed the Director's citation-count-focused denial, crediting letters describing multi-employer, independent adoption of the Petitioner's techniques as sufficient to show field-wide influence.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3(c)
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
- Matter of Otiende
- Section 291 of the Act
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
Multiple independent letters (beyond employer) documented concrete, specific instances where others applied the Petitioner's techniques with measurable results (cost/time savings), satisfying the 'degree of influence on the field' standard despite low citation counts.
Supplement citation counts with detailed third-party letters showing concrete adoption/application of the petitioner's specific technical contributions by unaffiliated companies or researchers, not just predictions of future benefit.
specific
field_advancement · economic_growth_generic · us_competitiveness
mixed
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod