This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a systems engineer and project manager, proposed to run an instructional initiative teaching computer programming and project management to minority females, students with disabilities, and other underserved groups through code clubs, camps, and mentorship sessions.
Field: STEM education / computer programming and project management · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
Director found Petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional; not disputed on appeal.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the Petitioner's evidence is insufficient to show that her proposed work haJ broader jmp]jcatjor for her field, as opposed to being limited to the students who participate in he”
“she has not demonstrated that her undertaking has implications beyond the students engaged in her program.”
“Without sufficient information or evidence regarding any projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to”
“the record does not show that benefits to the U.S. regional or national economy resulting from her educational program would reach the level of "substantial positive economic effects"”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“stating that their organizations accepted the Petitioner's offer to host”
AAO decision text - media · discounted
- other · discounted
“the record does not demonstrate that the Petitioner's instructional activities offer benefits that extend beyond her program”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
Notable
The AAO first found the Petitioner failed to properly apply for the NIW because she did not execute Form ETA-750B or equivalent ETA-9089 parts J/K/L, calling this an independent alternate basis for dismissal alongside the Dhanasar prong-1 failure. Extensive OCR redaction/garbling of proper nouns and program names throughout the text.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- Poursina v. USCIS
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an assistant professor of Arabic, proposed to continue teaching Levantine-Modern Standard Arabic to U.S.
- The Petitioner, a secondary school teacher, proposed to develop and implement an open educational resource program to ex
- The Petitioner proposed to establish a consulting company in Missouri to design and implement a nationally adaptable tea
- The Petitioner, an arts, drama, and music teacher and entrepreneur, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of excep
- The petitioner, a mathematics teacher with 17 years of experience, proposed to operate a company offering online math tu