NIW Bearings
dismissedJAN272021_04B52032021-01-27 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a systems engineer and project manager, proposed to run an instructional initiative teaching computer programming and project management to minority females, students with disabilities, and other underserved groups through code clubs, camps, and mentorship sessions.

Field: STEM education / computer programming and project management · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

Director found Petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional; not disputed on appeal.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Petitioner's evidence is insufficient to show that her proposed work haJ broader jmp]jcatjor for her field, as opposed to being limited to the students who participate in he
she has not demonstrated that her undertaking has implications beyond the students engaged in her program.
Without sufficient information or evidence regarding any projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to
the record does not show that benefits to the U.S. regional or national economy resulting from her educational program would reach the level of "substantial positive economic effects"

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    stating that their organizations accepted the Petitioner's offer to host
    AAO decision text
  • media · discounted
  • other · discounted
    the record does not demonstrate that the Petitioner's instructional activities offer benefits that extend beyond her program
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO first found the Petitioner failed to properly apply for the NIW because she did not execute Form ETA-750B or equivalent ETA-9089 parts J/K/L, calling this an independent alternate basis for dismissal alongside the Dhanasar prong-1 failure. Extensive OCR redaction/garbling of proper nouns and program names throughout the text.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles