The Petitioner, an actuarial associate specializing in volunteer firefighter retirement programs, proposed to use AI and machine learning to improve the solvency and cost-efficiency of U.S. public pension systems, including through enhanced actuarial projections and personalized retirement investment strategies.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

“the Petitioner has not shown that his proposed endeavor stands to sufficiently extend beyond the Petitioner's clientele and his immediate projects to impact his field”

“none of the articles mention the Petitioner or his particular projects, or otherwise speak to the potential prospective impact of his specific proposed endeavor.”

“The determination of national importance does not focus on the importance of pension reform initiatives in general or of using AI to protect retirement benefits”

“We are not persuaded by the argument that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has national importance due to the shortage of workers in the Petitioner's field.”

“the Petitioner has not offered sufficient information and evidence to demonstrate that the prospective impact of his proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance.”

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

• recommendation letter · discounted

  “do not contain sufficient information and explanation, nor does the record include adequate corroborating evidence, to show that his specific proposed work offers broader implications”

  AAO decision text
• other · discounted

  “none of the articles mention the Petitioner or his particular projects, or otherwise speak to the potential prospective impact of his specific proposed endeavor.”

  AAO decision text
• resume experience · discounted

  “The Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work in his field relate to the second prong of the Dhanasar framework, which 'shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national.'”

  AAO decision text
• other · discounted

  “the Petitioner has not established that his proposed endeavor stands to impact or significantly reduce the claimed national shortage.”

  AAO decision text
• degree · credited

Where this case turned

• Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
• Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
• Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
• Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1 — argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar

Notable

The AAO explicitly corrected the Petitioner's misattribution of the 'need not be certain' language to Dhanasar's first prong, clarifying it appears only in the second prong discussion. The AAO also noted that occupational shortages are addressed through the labor certification process, reinforcing why that argument cannot substitute for national importance under prong one. Substantial merit was conceded; only national importance was disputed.

Cases in adjacent profiles

• The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
• The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
• The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
• The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
• The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod