This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, an ESL teacher, sought to continue working as an English as a second language instructor in the United States.
Field: English as a second language teaching · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
How the evidence was treated
- motion resubmission · discounted
“reargue facts and issues we have already considered in our previous decisions”
AAO decision text
This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
This is a second motion to reconsider; the AAO's substantive prong analysis occurred in a prior appeal decision (national importance found lacking, dispositive), not in this decision. The Petitioner unsuccessfully argued Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo overruled Dhanasar's controlling status and raised an APA arbitrary-and-capricious argument, both rejected as outside the limited scope of motion review under 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1).
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5
- Matter of O-S-G-
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
This was a second motion to reconsider; Petitioner failed to show AAO's prior denial misapplied law/policy, relying instead on inapplicable Loper Bright and APA arguments rather than evidence of national importance.
Motions to reconsider must identify specific legal/policy errors in the latest decision, not relitigate facts or invoke inapplicable case law like Loper Bright.
vague
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, an assistant professor of Arabic, proposed to continue teaching Levantine-Modern Standard Arabic to U.S.
- The Petitioner, a secondary school teacher, proposed to develop and implement an open educational resource program to ex
- The Petitioner proposed to establish a consulting company in Missouri to design and implement a nationally adaptable tea
- The Petitioner, an arts, drama, and music teacher and entrepreneur, sought EB-2 classification as an individual of excep
- The petitioner, a mathematics teacher with 17 years of experience, proposed to operate a company offering online math tu