NIW Bearings
dismissedJAN032023_03B52032023-01-03 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a human resources specialist, proposed to establish a firm in the United States to provide human resources services to other U.S. companies.

Field: human resources · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Petitioner did not establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in her specialty; a new letter submitted on appeal was not from a former employer and described duties inconsistent with human resources work, undermining her claim.

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · discounted
    the duties described by Mr. d-S-C- do not conform with the those of a human resources specialist
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    this letter is not from the Petitioner's former employer, and as such it has reduced probative value
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO found the Director erred in not flagging all deficiencies in the RFE per 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(8)(iv) and USCIS Policy Manual E.6(F)(3), and so reviewed new evidence submitted on appeal despite the general rule against considering evidence offered for the first time on appeal (citing Matter of Soriano and Matter of Obaigbena). The AAO expressly declined to reach the Dhanasar prongs, citing INS v. Bagamasbad, because the threshold EB-2 advanced-degree failure was dispositive.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(g)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of Ho
  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles