NIW Bearings
dismissedFEB282022_02B52032022-02-28 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner proposed to work as a medical researcher in the U.S. healthcare and medical industry, and later added a plan to work as a biologist, researcher, and entrepreneur operating an online organic vitamin/supplement company.

Field: biology / medical research · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner failed to establish she qualifies as an advanced degree professional (inconsistent employment letters/dates and hours contradicting Form ETA 750B, degree deemed equivalent only to a bachelor's, and field mismatch with medical scientist requiring a Ph.D.) or as an individual of exceptional ability (failed to satisfy at least three of six regulatory criteria - salary, membership dates, and peer recognition were all found insufficient).

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · discounted
    The Petitioner must resolve these inconsistencies with independent, objective evidence pointing to where the truth lies.
    AAO decision text
  • degree · discounted
    the possession of a degree, diploma, certificate or similar award ... shall not by itself be considered sufficient evidence of exceptional ability.
    AAO decision text
  • certification membership · discounted
    Without evidence which demonstrates that she was a member at the time of filing, we cannot conclude that she has met this criterion.
    AAO decision text
  • recommendation letter · discounted
    while the letters are complimentary, they do not sufficiently establish the Petitioner's significant contributions to the field.
    AAO decision text
  • business plan · discounted
    A petitioner may not make material changes to a petition in an effort to make a deficient petition conform to USCIS requirements.
    AAO decision text
All 6 evidence items
  • motion resubmission · ignored
    we need not accept evidence offered for the first time on appeal.
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The Petitioner failed threshold EB-2 eligibility (both advanced-degree professional and exceptional-ability pathways), so the AAO explicitly declined to reach the national interest waiver prongs: 'further analysis of her eligibility for a national interest waiver would serve no meaningful purpose.' The decision also flags an impermissible material change under Matter of Izummi when the Petitioner added an 'entrepreneur' business-plan endeavor at the RFE stage.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(12)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • Matter of Ho
  • Matter of Izummi
  • Matter of Katigbak
  • Matter of R-A-M-

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Petitioner failed to establish underlying EB-2 eligibility (advanced degree or exceptional ability) due to inconsistent employment/membership evidence, making NIW analysis unnecessary.

Transferable lesson

Secure and document the underlying EB-2 classification with consistent, corroborated evidence before litigating NIW prongs; avoid material endeavor changes mid-case.

Endeavor framing

vague

National-importance theory

geographic_or_shortage_area · economic_job_creation

Evidence targeting

person_focused

Cases in adjacent profiles