dismissedFEB012024_03B52032024-02-01 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a registered nurse, proposed a multi-year plan to work as an ICU nurse in Florida, pursue a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree, and later serve as a nurse educator, travel nurse, and nurse coordinator.
Field: nursing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the record does not elaborate on how her proposed employment as a nurse extends beyond her prospective patients or the hospitals or clinics that would employ her services to affect the field of nursing or healthcare industry more broadly”
“the Petitioner does not meaningfully explain how a single nurse can produce the prospective impact rising to the level of national importance”
“The industry reports and articles on record do not discuss the specific impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor but only address the nursing field in general”
“the Petitioner has not provided any substantive and corroborative evidence of the endeavor's significant potential for job creation or other substantial economic effects in an economically depressed area”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“they only describe the Petitioner's experience, skills, and abilities as a nurse in her prior employment settings and not the specific impact of her proposed endeavor”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“The industry reports and articles on record do not discuss the specific impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor but only address the nursing field in general”
AAO decision text - motion resubmission · discounted
“reasserts... and submits the same or similar articles and reports discussing the value of the nursing profession and nursing shortage”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
2,589coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Matter of L-A-C-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a pharmacist, proposed to work in the United States through her own company providing pharmaceutical reg
- The Petitioner, a Brazilian-trained physiotherapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist and entrepreneur in the Un
- The Petitioner, a resident physician in New York holding a Chinese bachelor of medicine (MBBS) degree found equivalent t
- The Petitioner, a music therapist, proposed to establish and expand music therapy services and community music programs
- The Petitioner, a physical therapist, proposed to work as a physical therapist in the United States while operating his