NIW Bearings
dismissedDEC302024_01B52032024-12-30 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a software developer, proposed an endeavor involving leading software development projects that he claims would impact the national economy and strengthen the U.S. information technology sector.

Field: software development · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    he reasserts arguments we have already considered and found unpersuasive in previous decisions
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    he does not assert any new facts supported by documentary evidence
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a purely procedural dismissal of a second combined motion to reopen/reconsider; the AAO did not re-engage with the substantive Dhanasar prong analysis, finding instead that the Petitioner merely reasserted previously rejected arguments (regarding national importance and being well positioned) without new facts or evidence of legal/policy error, so no prong is substantively analyzed in this decision.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(4)
  • Matter of Coelho

Cases in adjacent profiles