NIW Bearings
dismissedDEC192023_04B52032023-12-19 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, an international tax advisor with 15+ years of experience, proposed to continue working with high-net-worth foreign (primarily Brazilian) investors to attract foreign direct investment into the United States through a self-developed tax/investment methodology.

Field: international tax advisory / foreign direct investment consulting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — addressed

Director found Petitioner qualified as advanced degree professional; not disputed on appeal.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the same evidence does not adequately describe how the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor would elevate foreign direct investment in a manner commensurate with matters of national importance.
The record does not contain evidence which would sufficiently support extrapolating one data point from one client's financial information to determine whether the potential prospective impact of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has broader implications or positive economic impact rising to a level of national importance.
The Petitioner's argument spotlights a fundamental misunderstanding of the Dhanasar framework's first prong.
these "independent expert opinion letters" do not illustrate how the Petitioner's proposed endeavor rises to a level impacting national importance either.
An~ !opinion exclusively makes generalized pronouncements about the Petitioner's background and skill, both of which are wholly irrelevant to an evaluation of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor under the first prong of the Dhanasar framework.

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    these "independent expert opinion letters" do not illustrate how the Petitioner's proposed endeavor rises to a level impacting national importance
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    The Dhanasar framework is consequently unconcerned with the success of the proposed endeavor or the Petitioner's track record in their field of endeavor previously.
    AAO decision text
  • business plan · discounted
    does not adequately describe the Petitioner's "methodology" implemented through their proposed endeavor such that we could evaluate the potential prospective impact
    AAO decision text
  • contract revenue · discounted
    It is not clear from the Petitioner's assertion whether the amount is gross income, net income, or total investment.
    AAO decision text
  • certification membership · discounted
    The certificates earned by the Petitioner relate to them as an individual and their own personal participation in activities to enrich a community of professionals or promote business development.
    AAO decision text
All 6 evidence items
  • other · discounted
    the record does not adequately explain how the Petitioner's work is "supporting the operations of the judicial system"
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Letters conclusory · p1letters praise skills in general terms without tracing specific impact
  • Letters not independent · p1letters come from employers and close collaborators, not independent experts
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

AAO corrects the Director's finding of a 'material change' to the endeavor via RFE response, finding the Petitioner consistently described the endeavor; also notes and forgives the Director's single erroneous use of a female pronoun for the Petitioner. AAO reserved prongs 2 and 3 given dispositive prong 1 failure. Petitioner's CISA critical-infrastructure argument analyzed and rejected in detail as an economic/national-importance argument under prong 1.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • Matter of Izummi
  • Matter of Katigbak
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Matter of Y-B-

Cases in adjacent profiles