NIW Bearings
otherDEC052017_01B52032017-12-05 · combined · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

A physician sought a national interest waiver under the physician-shortage-area provision to work full-time in clinical medicine, initially as an employee of a company owned by his brother, later found to lack a valid employer-employee relationship.

Field: medicine (clinical medical practice) · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

How the evidence was treated

  • other · discounted
    the evidence does not establish his eligibility as an employee of under 8 C.F.R. § 204.12(c)(1)(i)
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    the evidence does not establish his eligibility as an employee of under 8 C.F.R. § 204.12(c)(1)(i)
    AAO decision text
  • motion resubmission · credited

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This case involves the physician shortage-area national interest waiver under section 203(b)(2)(B)(ii)/8 C.F.R. 204.12, not the general Dhanasar three-prong national interest waiver, so no prong analysis occurred. The AAO's prior appellate decision denying eligibility for failure to establish an employer-employee relationship stood; on motion the AAO granted reopening only to withdraw a willful misrepresentation finding based on new affidavit and W-2 evidence, while denying reconsideration as moot and reaffirming that eligibility under 8 C.F.R. § 204.12(c)(1)(i) was not established.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)

Cases in adjacent profiles