dismissedAUG312023_03B52032023-08-31 · appeal · Texas Service Center
This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner sought to continue working as a financial consultant for her employer, helping clients manage debt, budgets, and credit to improve their financial stability.
Field: financial and credit management consulting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the [P]etitioner has not established that the proposed endeavor is of national importance”
“the importance of the industry, field, or profession in which an individual will work is not the relevant question for determining national importance”
“Although providing financial consulting services to the Petitioner's employer's clients will benefit her employer and its clients, the record does not establish how the proposed endeavor will have "national or even global implications”
“they instead provide generalizations about the finance industry, consumer credit, the roles of financial consultants, and similar topics that do not focus on the "specific endeavor”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- media · discounted
“the generalized articles about the finance industry in the record do not address the Petitioner and her proposed endeavor”
AAO decision text - recommendation letter · discounted
“they instead provide generalizations about the finance industry, consumer credit, the roles of financial consultants, and similar topics”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Employer-specific benefit · p1 — "work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
- Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
746coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds →
Notable
The Director issued directly conflicting findings on substantial merit within the same decision (stating both that it was established and not established); the AAO declined to resolve this conflict, resting dismissal solely on national importance.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- Matter of L-A-C-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner proposed to work as an IT consultant in the United States, providing cybersecurity and digital transforma
- The petitioner proposed to establish his own company providing specialized business consultancy, auditing, and training
- The petitioner proposed to work as a consultant engineer through his own company, specializing in development projects t
- The Petitioner proposed to start a project management consultancy in the United States that would help small and mid-siz
- The Petitioner proposed to establish a legal consultancy in the United States focused on alternative dispute resolution