NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG312016_01B52032016-08-31 · motion_reconsider · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

A registered nurse sought EB-2 classification as either an advanced-degree professional or individual of exceptional ability, with a national interest waiver of the job offer/labor certification requirement, in connection with her nursing employment.

Field: nursing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The prior AAO decision found the Petitioner did not demonstrate she is a member of the professions or that she qualifies as an individual of exceptional ability.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established

we found that the Petitioner did not show that her proposed employment will be national in scope

AAO decision text

Prong 3 — balance of factorsnot established

she will benefit the national interest to a greater extent than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    she submits an almost identical brief to the one on appeal, presenting arguments previously discussed in our dismissal of the appeal
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
  • U.S. worker availability · p3the impracticality of a labour-market test was asserted, not established
1,748coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

This is a procedural denial of a motion to reconsider: the AAO found the Petitioner merely resubmitted the prior brief without alleging factual or legal error, and also failed to include the required statement regarding pending judicial proceedings under 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(iii).

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)

Cases in adjacent profiles