This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a business administrator, proposed to continue working in business administration/management roles, asserting broad benefits to businesses and the U.S. economy.
Field: business administration · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
Director found Petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional; this was not disputed on appeal.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“The evidence provided does not demonstrate that this specific endeavor is of national importance.”
“the brief and the record does not sufficiently explain how her employment as an individual business administrator would impact the overall field more broadly beyond her employer on the level of national importance.”
“the brief does not supply sufficient explanations to clarify how her skills differ deeply or what solutions she will offer to benefit the community.”
“this focus is misplaced as is not the importance of the field that determines an endeavor's national importance, but rather how the specific endeavor will impact the field”
“the Petitioner has not supported her claims with evidence to establish how the economic activity of her proposed endeavor as an individual business administrator would rise to the level of national importance.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“the advisory opinion is of little probative value as Dr. ... evaluation of national importance does not adequately address the requirements of Dhanasar”
AAO decision text - resume experience · discounted
“this type of evidence is more appropriate for the second prong when determining if the petitioner is well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.”
AAO decision text - certification membership · discounted
“the evidence shows that the Petitioner began the position and completed the training after the petition's filing.”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“statements in a brief, motion, or Notice of Appeal are not evidence and thus are not entitled to any evidentiary weight”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Employer-specific benefit · p1 — "work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
- Endeavor too vague · p1 — described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
Notable
AAO explicitly notes RFE-submitted training certificate and updated employment documentation were dated after filing and thus disregarded under the filing-date eligibility rule (8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1),(12)).
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
- Flores v. Garland
- Matter of L-A-C-
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
Petitioner failed to show the specific endeavor's impact extends beyond her individual employer(s) to the broader field, region, or national economy, as required for national importance.
Define a concrete endeavor and support it with evidence quantifying impact beyond the employer—generic economic-contribution assertions and skill-focused expert letters cannot satisfy prong one.
vague
economic_growth_generic · field_advancement
person_focused
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod