NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG242023_13B52032023-08-24 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a bodywork technician in the automotive industry, sought to continue working in automotive repair in the United States, claiming exceptional ability.

Field: automotive bodywork/repair · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

Petitioner satisfied at least 3 of 6 regulatory criteria for exceptional ability but failed the final merits determination showing a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.

How the evidence was treated

  • certification membership · discounted
    the record lacked evidence that the Petitioner's professional achievements set him apart from other bodywork technicians
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    he does not address the Director's final merits determination analysis and instead continues to focus exclusively on the fact that the minimum evidentiary requirements were satisfied
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

Threshold EB-2 (exceptional ability) failure was dispositive; AAO expressly declined to reach the Dhanasar NIW prongs, reserving all appellate arguments regarding the waiver itself. AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision per Matter of Burbano.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.3
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
  • Chen v. INS
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles