NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG232021_05B52032021-08-23 · appeal · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a physical therapist, sought EB-2 classification as an advanced-degree professional with a national interest waiver, though the specific proposed endeavor was not reached in the decision.

Field: physical therapy · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

The Petitioner did not establish at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience as required to qualify as the equivalent of an advanced degree; employer and patient letters were insufficient and internally inconsistent regarding hours worked and dates of employment.

How the evidence was treated

  • resume experience · discounted
    the Petitioner has not established that he has at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in physical therapy
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    the letters do not provide sufficient information to determine the number of hours he worked
    AAO decision text

This record is one of thousands, each coded for the reasons it turned. A placement shows where your profile sits in that record, not what it predicts. See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The AAO resolved the appeal entirely on the threshold advanced-degree/experience issue (finding the Petitioner's combined full-time and part-time/self-employment claims inconsistent and unsubstantiated) and expressly declined to reach the Dhanasar national interest waiver analysis, reserving that issue as unnecessary to the outcome.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Poursina v. USCIS

Cases in adjacent profiles