This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner intended to own and operate a consulting firm providing business management solutions—including strategy development, operational optimization, market analysis, financial planning, and legal compliance—to Latino-owned and other minority-owned small and medium-sized enterprises in Florida's service sector.
Field: business management consulting · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the Petitioner must demonstrate the national importance of his specific, proposed endeavor of providing his services as a business management consultant to Latino and minority-owned small and medium-sized companies in Florida.”
“he has not provided sufficient evidence of the potential national impact of his specific proposed endeavor rather than the importance of minority-owned businesses and the field of business consulting management in general.”
“the letter discusses the importance of business management in general rather than focusing on the national importance of the Petitioner's specific, proposed endeavor.”
“the Petitioner did not demonstrate how his business plan's claimed revenue and employment projections, even if credible or plausible, have significant potential to employ U.S. workers or otherwise offer substantial positive economic effects for our nation.”
“the record does not demonstrate that, beyond the limited benefits provided to its prospective clients and employees, the Petitioner's proposed endeavor has broader implications rising to the level of having national importance”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- recommendation letter · discounted
“the letter discusses the importance of business management in general rather than focusing on the national importance of the Petitioner's specific, proposed endeavor.”
AAO decision text - business plan · discounted
“the Petitioner did not establish the significance of this data to show that the benefits to the regional or national economy would reach the level of "substantial positive economic effects"”
AAO decision text - resume experience · discounted
“the letters cover the Petitioner's prior work and accomplishments and relate more to the second prong rather than the first prong of the Dhanasar framework.”
AAO decision text - other · discounted
“the matter here is not whether these topics are nationally important.”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Business plan speculative · p1 — projections without a documented basis or steps
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
- Letters not independent · p1 — letters come from employers and close collaborators, not independent experts
- Local, not national scope · p1 — impact confined to clients / a region
Notable
AAO cites Flores v. Garland (5th Cir. 2023) and companion circuit cases affirming the discretionary nature of NIW grants; also notes petitioner's own concession on appeal that the recommendation letters relate more to prong 2 than prong 1, which the AAO uses against him.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 103.3
- 8 C.F.R. 103.5
- Flores v. Garland
- Matter of L-A-C-
What this case teaches
Analyst reading of the decision text.
The importance of minority-owned businesses as a class did not transfer to his specific consultancy; ripple-effect claims and unexplained projections showed no impact beyond his clients, so prong-1 national importance failed.
Serving a nationally important population is not a nationally important endeavor; show how your specific services extend beyond your clients, with evidence rather than ripple-effect reasoning.
moderate
economic_job_creation · geographic_or_shortage_area · government_interest
mixed
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner proposed to work as an IT consultant in the United States, providing cybersecurity and digital transforma
- The petitioner proposed to establish his own company providing specialized business consultancy, auditing, and training
- The petitioner proposed to work as a consultant engineer through his own company, specializing in development projects t
- The Petitioner proposed to start a project management consultancy in the United States that would help small and mid-siz
- The Petitioner proposed to establish a legal consultancy in the United States focused on alternative dispute resolution