NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG122022_01B52032022-08-12 · combined · Nebraska Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a physician, initially proposed an endeavor as a medical scientist focusing on medical research, then attempted to substitute this with a proposed endeavor as a physician after the RFE.

Field: medicine / medical research · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 2 — well positionednot established · dispositive

the Petitioner, a physician, did not establish that he has any experience in this area and, thus, did not demonstrate that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Rather, it represents a major material change, from one occupation (medical researcher) to another (physician).

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    Resubmitting previously provided evidence or reasserting previously stated facts do not meet the requirements of a motion to reopen.
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • experience not progressive or unrelated · p2claimed equivalency experience is not progressive, or sits outside the field
  • Record of success insufficient · p2a claimed track record the documents do not establish
3coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The case turns on a material-change-in-endeavor issue: the Petitioner attempted to substitute a new proposed endeavor (physician) for the originally filed one (medical researcher) in response to an RFE, which the AAO treated as an impermissible material change under Matter of Izummi rather than a mere clarification. On motion, the Petitioner made only general, unsupported claims of legal error without addressing this dispositive issue.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.2(b)(1)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5
  • Matter of Izummi

Cases in adjacent profiles