NIW Bearings
dismissedAUG022023_01B52032023-08-02 · appeal · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner, a nurse, proposed to work in the United States applying modern nursing strategies and his versatile clinical skills (pediatric, neonatal, intensive/emergency care) across various healthcare settings.

Field: nursing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

EB-2 threshold — not met

AAO agreed the Petitioner did not establish exceptional ability (met 3 criteria but failed final merits determination) and found insufficient, inconsistent evidence of the five years' progressive experience needed to qualify as an advanced degree professional, though it declined to base the dismissal on these grounds.

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

the Petitioner did not specify or describe specific strategies or techniques he plans to use in his proposed endeavor
he did not explain how his knowledge and abilities will go beyond impacting the workplaces and patients he plans to service
such letters offer no persuasive detail concerning the impact of the proposed endeavor or how such impact would extend beyond the Petitioner's prospective patients and employers
they are not sufficient to support a finding that the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor has national importance
the Petitioner does not identify the source of this information to establish its accuracy
such information does not, however, focus on the Petitioner's specific endeavor or establish that the Petitioner's specific endeavor would impact the overall nursing field

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • recommendation letter · discounted
    such letters offer no persuasive detail concerning the impact of the proposed endeavor or how such impact would extend beyond the Petitioner's prospective patients and employers
    AAO decision text
  • resume experience · discounted
    Without independent, objective evidence resolving this inconsistency, we are unable to verify the accurate length of the Petitioner's employment
    AAO decision text
  • certification membership · discounted
    he did not demonstrate that he possesses a degree of expertise that surpasses what is ordinarily encountered in that field
    AAO decision text
  • degree · discounted
    represents attainment of up to 1 year of graduate study in the United States and is therefore not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree
    AAO decision text
  • other · discounted
    they are not sufficient to support a finding that the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor has national importance
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Economic claims unsupported · p1job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
  • Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
  • Local, not national scope · p1impact confined to clients / a region
  • Occupational shortage argument rejected · p1argues a labor shortage — the labor-certification question, not Dhanasar
2,501coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The Director had found the endeavor met substantial merit but not national importance; AAO separately found EB-2 threshold deficiencies (exceptional ability and advanced degree professional experience, including an unresolved full-time/part-time employment inconsistency) but expressly declined to dismiss on those grounds, resolving the appeal solely on prong 1 national importance.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
  • Matter of Ho
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Poursina v. USCIS

What this case teaches

Analyst reading of the decision text.

Decisive factor

Petitioner failed to show his specific endeavor (as opposed to the nursing field generally) had impact extending beyond his own patients/employers to national scale.

Transferable lesson

Tie the endeavor's impact with concrete, sourced data to national-scale effects beyond immediate employer/patients, not just field-wide statistics or personal credentials.

Endeavor framing

vague

National-importance theory

public_health · economic_job_creation · field_advancement · geographic_or_shortage_area

Evidence targeting

person_focused

Cases in adjacent profiles