This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.
The Petitioner, a communications specialist and video editor in the film/television industry, sought to continue creating promotional videos and behind-the-scenes documentaries for major Hollywood studios and film clients.
Field: film/television communications and video editing · Read the decision (uscis.gov)
EB-2 threshold — addressed
Director and AAO agreed Petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional based on her U.S. master's degree.
Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive
“the benefits provided by a single communications specialist are too attenuated to have national importance.”
“her work would "primarily serve to benefit her employer and its clients."”
“The Petitioner, however, has not sufficiently demonstrated that her video editing work increases a film's likelihood of generating profits.”
“the Petitioner has not demonstrated that her particular work would benefit the field or the country's economy at a nationally important level.”
AAO decision text
How the evidence was treated
- degree · credited
- other · discounted
“these claims may be true. But the Petitioner has not demonstrated that the scope of her proposed work would generate these benefits at nationally important levels.”
AAO decision text
Where this case turned
- Economic claims unsupported · p1 — job/revenue projections with no corroborating basis
- Employer-specific benefit · p1 — "work furthers my company's product" — value accrues to one firm
- Field importance conflated with endeavor · p1 — argues the field matters, not the specific endeavor
Notable
AAO explicitly analogized the petitioner's situation to the facts of Matter of Dhanasar itself, finding her endeavor similarly lacked a demonstrated broader field/economic impact despite substantial merit; AAO declined to reach prongs 2 and 3 after resolving the appeal on prong 1 alone.
Authorities this decision leans on
From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.
- 8 C.F.R. 204.5(k)(2)
- Matter of L-A-C-
Cases in adjacent profiles
- The Petitioner, a mechanical engineer, proposed to advance thermal management solutions for high-power, compact, and rel
- The Petitioner, a senior engineering program manager specializing in electromechanical systems, proposed to advance moto
- The Petitioner proposed to provide innovative solutions to optimize freight and vessel operations in the U.S. shipping i
- The Petitioner, a sales manager, proposed an endeavor in the United States for which he sought an EB-2 national interest
- The Petitioner proposed to lead a nationwide initiative to develop and implement a standardized materials management mod