NIW Bearings
dismissedAPR042025_05B52032025-04-04 · motion_reconsider · Texas Service Center

This is an AAO appeal decision — a case denied once and appealed. It shows how the framework is applied; it is not the filing population.

The Petitioner sought to continue working as a sales manager providing pre-sale consulting, sales support, strategy optimization, and operational support services to U.S. logistics companies.

Field: sales/logistics consulting management · Read the decision (uscis.gov)

Prong 1 — national importancenot established · dispositive

we concurred with the Director's determination that the Petitioner did not establish that his proposed endeavor has national importance

AAO decision text

How the evidence was treated

  • motion resubmission · discounted
    a motion to reconsider is not a process by which the party may submit, in essence, the same brief and seek reconsideration
    AAO decision text

Where this case turned

  • Endeavor too vague · p1described as a job role, not a defined undertaking
1,581coded decisions carry the failure named in this record. A placement shows where your profile sits among them, not what it predicts.See where your profile sits — 90 seconds

Notable

The decision is primarily procedural, addressing the standard for a motion to reconsider (8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)) and clarifying that AAO appellate review is de novo; it declines to revisit prongs 2 and 3 since the dispositive failure on prong 1 (national importance) alone justified dismissal of the underlying appeal.

Authorities this decision leans on

From the doctrinal survivor set — 187 authority tests across 47 distinct authorities cleared the differential-lift gates. Only those appear here.

  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(1)(ii)
  • 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(3)
  • Matter of Coelho
  • Matter of L-A-C-
  • Matter of O-S-G-

Cases in adjacent profiles